As we first reported earlier this year: Mission Rock Partners, which is a Joint Venture between the San Francisco Giants and Tishman Speyer, is positioning to break ground on the first phase of their massive (yes, massive) redevelopment of the Port’s 28‐acre Seawall Lot 337 (a.k.a Oracle Park’s Parking... Read More »
Mission Rock Partners, which is a Joint Venture between the San Francisco Giants and Tishman Speyer, is positioning to break ground on the first phase of their massive (yes, massive) redevelopment of the Port’s 28‐acre Seawall Lot 337 (a.k.a Oracle Park’s Parking Lot A) by the end of this... Read More »
In the works for over a decade, the official development agreement and approvals necessary for the San Francisco Giants to move forward with their massive (yes, massive) redevelopment of A&T Park’s Parking Lot A into “Mission Rock,” the plans for which include over 1.4 million square feet of office,... Read More »
The San Francisco Giants have pushed back the anticipated ground breaking for the first phase of their proposed Mission Rock Development to rise on AT&T Park’s Parking Lot A to “as early as 2019” or “as late as 2027.” And the Giants’ proposed redevelopment of Pier 48, upon which... Read More »
The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) and refined plans for the San Francisco Giants’ proposed 28-acre Mission Rock project, which is slated to rise up to 240 feet in height on the Port of San Francisco’s Seawall Lot 337 (a.k.a. Giants Parking Lot A), have just been released along... Read More »
The San Francisco Giants have reduced the building heights and increased the percentage of affordable housing units for the proposed 28-acre Mission Rock development to rise on the Giants’ current parking Lot A. The revised plan still includes around 1,500 apartments, but 33 percent of the rentals are now... Read More »
As part of the Giants’ proposed Mission Rock Development, a new park, plaza and public square at the heart of the development will be built on eight of the area’s 27-acres. Originally constructed as part of the AT&T Park project, China Basin Park will be expanded to 5-acres with... Read More »
The four year old plans to develop San Francisco’s Seawall Lot 337/Pier 48 dubbed “Mission Rock” have officially been dusted off with the Giants and their surviving development partner, the Cordish Cos., touting a plan to break ground for the massive project, currently the site of the San Francisco... Read More »
The ten year lease between the City and County of San Francisco and the China Basin Ballpark Company, a subsidiary of the San Francisco Giants, for Seawall Lot 337, also known as Parking Lot A, expired at the end of 2009 and has been month-to-month since. Slated for development,... Read More »
The proposed retail space for San Francisco’s Seawall Lot 337/Pier 48 (a.k.a. “Mission Rock”) has been cut by more than half and the developers are pushing to “complete the project in phases over a 17-year period that would start in 2013.” As it stands, the project would produce approximately... Read More »
“Office space for what ? .. why would anyone need it, in a city with a muni system that does not func...” [more]
“I want to know what happened to the 3 bedroom penthouse unit in the building, it was offered up for ...” [more]
“Eccch, what a monstrosity. Mansicalco really is the architect to the overweening tech bro. But I tho...” [more]
“Right, because clients NEVER get emotional about real estate and insist on "wanting it". It's always...” [more]
“Thanks. I have no reason to disagree, just curious....” [more]
“UPDATE: With the percent positive rate for testing holding at over 5 percent, the average number of ...” [more]
“UPDATE: Visualizing the Vacant Office Space in San Francisco, Take Two...” [more]
“That would be the basis for an awesome city & regional planning M.S. thesis project. At what ...” [more]
“This sounds like "a prayer" or a hope. But the thing is, even if you believe there will be a huge p...” [more]
“The two arguments of course are: 1) equity value will go up, and if it does you’re doing so with o...” [more]