42 Fernwood Drive
It’s a contractor’s special versus cosmetic fixer and priced to attract attention at $599,000 with offers due next week. We not only see potential but opportunity for neighborhood goodwill as well, at least once the reconstruction of 42 Fernwood is complete.
42 Fernwood Drive Kitchen
UPDATE: With respect to wonky angles, a plugged-in reader reports: “Viewed it. The house really is leaning sideways. The camera angle is accentuating that, but not by too much.”
∙ Listing: 42 Fernwood Drive (3/2.5) 1,976 sqft – $599,000 [42fernwood.com] [MLS]

18 thoughts on “Opportunity (For Neighborhood Goodwill At The Very Least)”
  1. Viewed it. The house really is leaning sideways. The camera angle is accentuating that, but not by too much. It would be a very big job for an area that in this market probably only supports 1.3M for a 2200 sq foot house.

  2. The amazing thing is that it appears that someone was actually living in that place. Wow. What a dump! Tear it down already!!

  3. The views are awesome, and the rest of the block is nice. It’s not a teardown, it needs work but it is salvageable. Plus it’s in SF so you’re not tearing it down.
    The only person living there now is a skunk. I looks like someone may have been living in there and shut most of the rooms off and just lived in a few of them.

  4. I hope they rebuild it or restore it as a beautiful Mission Revival or Spanish Colonial Revival style home (or something similar) and not a craptastic dwellified monstrosity that clashes with every other house in the neighborhood just because they can.

  5. @Brahama: you could buy it and re-build it any way you want! Wouldn’t that be nice?

  6. so what does this place go for?
    and how much work($) does it need?
    i think purchase for $600,000 and $300,000 to be livable(livable not nice)
    is the hiouse really leaning ? serious foundation issues can add another $100-200,000

  7. Houses like this are a legacy of Prop 13. If we had a more rational taxatin system, these would get sold off way before they reach this level of disrepair.

  8. Jimmy, I’m not a flipper, but I think the reason that this place, and houses in similar condition, are called “contractor’s specials” is because it’s highly unlikely that a non-contractor could buy it get it into shape unless they had all cash to purchase it, cash to cover 100% of the renovation and repair costs, plus carrying costs.
    Private construction loans (at least the last time I checked, which was about 13 months ago) have very short time lines attached to them so unless you’re wading in cash (read:, you’re willing to lose about 10-15% on the project as a whole because it’s going to be your primary residence) or a contractor yourself, it’s unlikely that you’re going to be able to make it pencil out. I admit I don’t know anything about 203(k) loans.

  9. This is a bit beyond what I’d be willing to take on as a homeowner. But if I did I’d hire a foundation contractor as the very first step to correct that tilt problem, then a roofer because there’s signs of water intrusion. If plumbing and/or electrical need updating do that too. Basically get everything done that would require tearing open the walls. Now you’ve got a house that’s even a bigger mess than now with gaping holes in the walls: time for the housewarming kegger.
    At this point a competent sheet rocker could turn the place is roughly a cosmetic fixer and you can incrementally finish off the rooms as time/money allows. Even with outsourcing the heavy work this is still a load of work but the sweat equity could pay off.
    So yeah, likely a contractor would be interested in a place like this though an intrepid layman might try to give it a go too.

  10. Yes the order would be:
    Architect
    Permit
    Framing Contractor (the roofer and foundation guys won’t fix the problems there. Level the floors first, then re-pour, then room.)

  11. Why, sparky-b, you’re such a gentlemen! Thank you.
    I realize some readers here don’t especially agree with the particular “process” I advocate, but, seriously, if one is going to be spending several hundred thousand $$ on this remodel, moving thru a logical design/permitting/construction process is really the best way to spend your money.
    A structural engineer would design the right foundations and seismic upgrade. You might decide to move interior walls to create better spaces; you may choose to do a horizontal rear addition that would add value and space to the property.
    All of those changes would require design, permitting and (IMO) bidding by at least 3 contractors.
    This is simply the process I use with all of my clients.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *