As we first reported in early March, having foreshadowed its revival back in 2015: Approved for development back in 2009 but subsequently waylaid by a successful appeal to San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors, an appeal which was championed by neighbors in the adjacent building (Baycrest) concerned about a loss... Read More »
19 Comments
“You left out "onerous rent regulations" and "lifetime leases". They factor in as well....” [more]
“NO. NO. And lastly, NO!...” [more]
“So refreshing to see other YIMBYs here. The Bay constantly feels like the global headquarters of NIM...” [more]
“UPDATE: Perhaps a bit ironically, considering the comments above, the Plans to Preserve This Histori...” [more]
“I think this is a spectacular building..........” [more]
“Perhaps inthemarket means 55 Oak St.? If so, I don't think that story has anything widely applicable...” [more]
“Sure. But by the same token, "value” is destroyed, or at least reduced, each time the property is ...” [more]
“UPDATE: The Refined Plans for That Supersized Telegraph Hill Development (and Ongoing Opposition)...” [more]
“I don't think so. As a project such as this appears with "building" entries as leading well before a...” [more]
“UPDATE: Bonus-Sized Development Approved, Now Seeking a Buyer to Actually Build...” [more]