38 Lusk Living Aerial

Purchased for $1,250,000 in 2008, the one-bedroom live/work loft number one at 38 Lusk returned to the market in July 2009 with a splashy new bath and listed for $1,499,000.

38 Lusk Bath After

Withdrawn from the market that December without a reduction or reported sale, the 1,850 square foot (per its current listing) condo has just been listed anew for $1,398,000.

38 Lusk Kitchen

As the less splashy bath above looked in 2008:

38 Lusk Bath Before

And while we don’t think you’ll find any permits for the remodeling online, keep in mind that doesn’t means it didn’t happen (or was free).

Comments from Plugged-In Readers

  1. Posted by Jus7tme

    Just looove the “exhibitionist victorian” (just made that name up) bathtub fashon that doesn’t even have curtain around.
    Actually, I think this design is a royal pain, imagine all the water on the floor if anyone wanbted to take a regular stand-up shower.
    And then there is the sink and table with the nicely exposed plumbing, tenement style circa 1930s, perhaps? And of course, the complete lack of storage for anything.
    Yeah, everyone will hate these idiotic bathrooms within just a few years.

  2. Posted by EH

    just7me: that bathroom doesn’t have a shower.

  3. Posted by SplishSplash!

    ^ look at the photo, there’s a handheld shower attachment on the tub.

  4. Posted by sfromeo

    What happened to the toilet?

  5. Posted by wooge

    Tax records show 1359 sq ft. Anyone know what’s up with stated 1850 sq ft?

  6. Posted by sf

    What a beautiful home!

  7. Posted by midcentfan

    Nice photo and art collection. Horst!

  8. Posted by SocketSite

    The list price for 38 Lusk has been reduced $100,000, now asking $1,298,000. Once again, purchased for $1,250,000 in 2008 but then remodeled (and listed for $1,499,000 in 2009).

  9. Posted by SocketSite

    The sale of 38 Lusk closed escrow today with a reported contract price of $1,230,000. Once again, purchased for $1,250,000 in 2008 but then remodeled and listed for $1,499,000 in 2009.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Articles