A comment on our post about 2825 Pine Street raises an interesting question: Is digitally altering an image used in a listing effective marketing, or is it akin to false advertising?
While it’s not at all unusual to use an artist’s sketch to portray a property in its best light, we’ve always know that it’s just that – a work of art. With a photograph, however, is there a line to be drawn between changing the color of the sky and altering unsightly elements such as power lines, baseboard heaters, or surrounding buildings?
∙ Sometimes It’s All About The Presentation (2825 Pine): Comments [SocketSite]
∙ Listing: 1331 Noe (2/2) – $1,298,000 [BJ Drobui] [MLS]