According Money Magazine’s “Best Places to Live 2006”, San Francisco isn’t a top 100 city. In fact, we didn’t even manage to rank in the top 25 with regard to home appreciation, incomes, job growth, commute, education, air quality, safety, or singles. We did, however, make the Top 25 list in two coveted categories: Priciest Homes (#13) and Skinniest (#2). Now about Houston ranking as the third skinniest…
∙ Money Magazine: Best Places to Live 2006 [Money]
Take that skinny ranking with a huge grain of salt. We’re tied with all those TX cities?????
Ya…there’s no way a Texas city could be anywhere near San Francisco on the skinniest list. [Removed by Editor]
This survey has no credibility, ranking Houston “skinny” is ridiculous. Men’s Health magazine (undoubtedly a better judge) has consistently ranked Houston as the fattest city several years in a row.
The Men’s Fitness poll used various bogus charecteristics such as “number of fast-food restaurants,” “number of bars,” and “weather” to arbitrarily determine which was the fattest city.
http://www.mensfitness.com/rankings/305
Money Magazine ussed average BMI, which seems far more adept at determining which cities are fat or skinny.