As we noted yesterday and a few years ago as well, the 220 Battery Street site upon which a two-story office building current sits, and upon which a modern three-story residential addition is now proposed to be built, is zoned for development up to 300-feet in height. And while... Read More »
October 22, 2015
38 Comments
38 Comments
“I live in this neighborhood. Cruise currently uses a garage on California (IIRC) as a charging and p...” [more]
“UPDATE: Perhaps a bit ironically, considering the comments above, the Plans to Preserve This Histori...” [more]
“There Are Not 40,000 Vacant Homes in San Francisco....” [more]
“I think this is a spectacular building..........” [more]
“Perhaps inthemarket means 55 Oak St.? If so, I don't think that story has anything widely applicable...” [more]
“"Architectural review"? What a joke. It's just as ugly as every other piece of crap built in recent ...” [more]
“Sure. But by the same token, "value” is destroyed, or at least reduced, each time the property is ...” [more]
“UPDATE: The Refined Plans for That Supersized Telegraph Hill Development (and Ongoing Opposition)...” [more]
“I don't think so. As a project such as this appears with "building" entries as leading well before a...” [more]
“UPDATE: Bonus-Sized Development Approved, Now Seeking a Buyer to Actually Build...” [more]