Articles Recently Tagged: Lumina

(38 posts)
Reduced Rents and Pricing for a Prized View Condo

Reduced Rents and Pricing for a Prized View Condo

Purchased from the sales office for $3,149,500, or roughly $2,003 per square foot, back in June of 2016, the “highest and largest” two-bedroom, two-bath unit in the Lumina tower at 338 Main Street, unit #35A, was then listed for $3,449,000 in March of 2017 while alternatively being offered for... Read More »

A Luxe Two-Bedroom with Views Trades for $232K Less

A Luxe Two-Bedroom with Views Trades for $232K Less

Purchased for $2,132,111 in December of 2017, the “luxe” two-bedroom, two-bath unit #25A in the Lumina tower at 201 Folsom Street, with “wrap-around floor-to-ceiling windows” and “awe-inspiring panoramic views,” returned to the market priced $2.5 million in August of 2018. Re-listed for $2,488,000 early last year, around the time... Read More »

Rent Versus Buy and Returns for the Cheapest Lumina Condo

Rent Versus Buy and Returns for the Cheapest Lumina Condo

Purchased for $800,000 back in September of 2017, the 763-square-foot unit #3D in the Lumina tower at 201 Folsom Street returned to the market priced at $820,000 this past May, positioned as “the lowest-priced condo in the tower,” with an efficient and desirable open-concept layout, an exclusive use patio,... Read More »

Luxury Two-Bedroom Fetches $225K Less

Luxury Two-Bedroom Fetches $225K Less

As we outlined in September, having sold for $2.425 million in April of 2016 (with 35 percent down and a below average 2.848 percent interest rate on a $1.58 million loan), the two-bedroom unit #22E in the LUMINA tower at 338 Main Street returned to the market priced at... Read More »

Luxury One-Bedroom Takes a $180K Hit

Luxury One-Bedroom Takes a $180K Hit

As we outlined in October: Purchased from the sales office for $1.57 million in February of 2016, the 993-square-foot, one-plus-bedroom unit #8J atop the Lumina plaza building at 333 Beale Street returned to the market priced at $1.449 million this past September. In addition to twelve-foot ceilings, two “spa-inspired... Read More »

A Signature Two-Bedroom Just Slipped Below Its 2016 Price

A Signature Two-Bedroom Just Slipped Below Its 2016 Price

Purchased for $1.895 million in the first quarter of 2016, the 1,401-square foot unit #21G in the LUMINA tower at 338 Main Street returned to the market priced at $2.195 million this past July, a sale at which would have represented total appreciation of 15.8 percent for the “coveted... Read More »

More Cuts for Luxury Condos Already Listed at a Loss

More Cuts for Luxury Condos Already Listed at a Loss

Purchased from the sales office for $1.57 million in February of 2016, the 993-square-foot, one-plus-bedroom unit #8J atop the Lumina plaza building at 333 Beale Street returned to the market priced at $1.449 million this past September. In addition to twelve-foot ceilings, two “spa-inspired bathrooms” and a modern kitchen... Read More »

Official Cuts for a Pair of Penthouse Shells

Official Cuts for a Pair of Penthouse Shells

As we first noted two months ago: Technically it’s not a price cut, the prevalence of which has been on the rise in San Francisco, as the list price for the 5,700-square-foot penthouse shell #41A atop the LUMINA tower at 201 Folsom Street remains at $11.495 million. But the... Read More »

Truth in Advertising, Eventually

Truth in Advertising, Eventually

Its sale won’t be perfectly apples-to-apples as the offering now includes a storage unit in the building which was purchased separately, but having been purchased for $1,419,478 in April of 2016, the “rarely available top floor plaza unit” #C8H at 333 Beale Street, a 985-square-foot, one-bedroom LUMINA condo with... Read More »

Sub-2016 Pricing for a Luxury Two-Bedroom with Views

Sub-2016 Pricing for a Luxury Two-Bedroom with Views

Purchased for $2.425 million in April of 2016, the two-bedroom unit #22E in the LUMINA tower at 338 Main Street returned to the market looking nearly new and priced at $2.488 million this past June, a sale at which would have represented total appreciation of 2.6 percent for the... Read More »